Features of open lung concept in respiratory therapy of severe community-acquired pneumonia

O.M Turkevych, O.P. Zakotyanskyi


Background. This article describes a clinical case of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Materials and me­thods. Sixty-seven-year old female patient was hospitalized to the intensive care unit with severe bilateral community-acquired pneumonia (CRB65 — 4 points, SMART-COP — 6 points, SpO2 = 78–80 %, paO2 — 40 mmHg, pCO2 — 95 mmHg, pH — 7.25; PaO2/FiO2 = 190 mmHg). Intensive care was started immediately. Hemodynamic parameters were stable. Patient was intubated after adequate preoxygenation (NIV CPAP = 8 сmH2O, FiO2 = 80 %). Sedation and myorelaxation continued for 48 hours. Antibacterial therapy and enteral fee­ding — according to protocol. Unrecruitable lungs were detected after mechanical ventilation started (PCV, p. control = 14 cmH2O, PEEP = 10 cmH2O). High PEEP le­vels (10 cmH2O) caused deterioration of lung compliance and SpO2. Recruitment maneuvers were ineffective. After that, adaptive support ventilation (%MV = 170 %) mode and lower levels of PEEP (5–6 cmH2O) were used. Patient was in supine position for first 24 hours of respiratory therapy. The next day we used prone position. Results. Adaptive support ventilation, lower PEEP levels and prone position improved patient’s oxygenation rates and respiratory properties of lungs. Conclusions. Selection of the optimal level of PEEP is an important stage of respiratory therapy in patients with unrecruitable lungs. Incorrect adjustment of mechanical ventilation parameters can significantly impair treatment results. Adaptive, intellectual modes of ventilation can be effective in the treatment of severe pneumonias.


respiratory therapy; open lung concept; community-acquired pneumonia


Başak Çoruh, Luks A.M. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure. When More May Not Be Better. ATS Journal. 2014. 11(8).

Gattinoni L., Carlesso E., Cressoni M. Selecting the “right” positive end-expiratory pressure level. Current opinion in critical care. 2015. 21(1). Р 50-57.

Akca O., Ball L., Belda J. WHO Needs High FiO2? Turk. J. Anaesthesiol. Reanim. 2017 Aug. 45(4). Р. 181-192. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.250701.

Cilloniz C., Ferrer M., Polverino E. еt al. Invasive mechanical ventilation in community acquired pneumonia. European Respiratory Journal. 2014. 44. P. 4932.

Cavalleri M., Barbagelata E., Diaz de Teran T. Noninvasive and invasive ventilation in severe pneumonia: Insights for the noninvasive ventilatory approach. Journal of Critical Care 48. August 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.07.030.

Jain Seema еt al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among US adults. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015. 373(5). Р. 415-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500245.

Al Otair Hadil A. еt al. Severe pneumonia requiring ICU admission: Revisited. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2015. 10(3). Р. 293-299.

Ryan D. et al. Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in the ICU setting and its effect on mortality, length of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay: a 1-year retrospective review. Critical Care. 2014. 18(2). P. 64.

Wilson P.A., Ferguson J. Severe community-acquired pneumonia: an Australian perspective. Internal medicine journal. 2005. 35(12). Р. 699-705.

Gillespie Delmar J., Kai Rehder. Body position and ventilation-perfusion relationships in unilateral pulmonary di­sease. Chest. 1987. 91(1). Р. 75-79.

Putensen C., Muders T., Kreyer S., Wrigge H. Alveolar ventilation and recruitment under lung protective ventilation, Anуsthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2008. 43(11/12). Р. 770-777. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1104617.

Сатишур О.Е. Механическая вентиляция легких. Медицинская литература. 2007. 352 с.

Copyright (c) 2019 EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2020


   Seo анализ сайта