DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.7.102.2019.180359

Clinical efficacy of different infusion regimens in high surgical risk patients with urgent abdominal pathology

O.V. Kravets

Abstract


Background. Long-term inpatient treatment and associated significant mortality are specifically attributed to urgent surgeries, 53 % of which are accounted for acute surgical pathology. The prolonged postoperative ileus is considered as one of the most severe complications. The purpose: to assess the efficacy of restrictive and goal-directed regimens of infusion therapy based on comparative analysis of clinical resolution of postoperative motor bowel disorders in high surgical risk patients with urgent abdominal pathology. Materials and methods. We examined 80 patients with urgent abdominal pathology. All patients underwent emergency laparotomy and were divided into 2 groups. In the first one (n = 40), the persons received goal-directed infusion therapy. The patients of the second group (n = 40) received infusion therapy in restrictive regimen. We measured fluid compartments of the body by the method of noninvasive bioelectrical impedance analysis of the body structure, function of gastrointestinal tract — by clinical implications, intra-abdominal pressure and ultrasound visualization of the intestinal wall condition. Results. Goal-directed infusion therapy formed the interstitial edema on the 1st day (p < 0.04), it correlated with an increase in the small intestine wall thickness (R = 0.86, p = 0.02), hyperextension of intestinal loops (R = 0.65, p = 0.02) and progression of intra-abdominal hypertension degree 1. Clinical recovery of gastric emptying occurred in 45 % patients within 5 postoperative days. In 55 % of patients, we observed prolongation of postoperative ileus. Restrictive regimen of infusion therapy was associated with physiological volume of interstitium during the whole period of observation, restoration of thickness (p < 0.02) and diameter (p < 0.01) of the small intestine from the 3rd day, absence of intra-abdominal hypertension signs. Autonomous defecation was observed from the 5th day in 70 % of patients. Conclusions. Goal-directed regimen of infusion therapy in high surgical risk patients with urgent abdominal pathology was accompanied by progression of interstitial edema on the 1st day, intra-abdominal hypertension degree 1 during two days, prolongation of postoperative ileus to the 7th day after surgery. Restrictive regimen of infusion in the perioperative period in high surgical risk patients with urgent abdominal pathology allows us to prevent the development of interstitial edema and intra-abdominal hypertension and reduce the terms of full recovery of gastric emptying to 5 days.


Keywords


urgent surgery; high surgical risk; regimen of infusion therapy; postoperative intestinal obstruction; intra-abdominal hypertension; sonographic diagnosis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Oliver C.M., Walke E., Giannaris S., Grocott M.P.W., Moonesinghe S.R. Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2015. 115(6). 849-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev350.

Vivekanand K.H., Mohankumar K., Prakash D., Vikranth S.N., Suresh T.N. Clinical outcome of emergency laparotomy: our experience at tertiary care centre (a case series). International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research. 2015. 6(10). 709-14. doi: 10.7439/ijbar.

Bragg D., El-Sharkawy A.M., Psaltis E., Maxwell-Armstrong C.A., Lobo D.N. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin. Nutr. 2015. 34. 367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.016.

Gero D., Gié O., Hübner M., Demartines N., Hahnloser D. Postoperative ileus: in search of an international consensus on

definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg. 2017. 402(1). 149-58. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1485-1.

Venara А., Slim К., Regimbeau J.M., Ortega-Deballon P., Vielle B., Lermite E. et al. Proposal of a new classification of postoperative ileus based on its clinical impact — results of a global survey and preliminary evaluation in colorectal surgery. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2017. 32(6). 797-803. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2788-6.

Luis N., Biondo S. Prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: still an unresolved problem. Ann. Laparosc. Endosc. Surg. 2018. 3. 3-15. doi:

Boland M.R., Noorani A., Varty K., Coffey J.C., Agha R., Walsh S.R. Perioperative fluid restriction in major abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, clinical trials. World J. Surg. 2013. 37. 1193-202. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1987-8.

Bereznytskiy Ya., compiler. [Standards of organization and professionally oriented protocols of emergency care for patients with surgical abdominal pathology (departmental instruction)]. Dnipro: Dnipro-VAL, 2010. 256 р. Ukrainian.

Carlisle J.B. Risk prediction models for major surgery: composing a new tune. Anaesthesia. 2019. 74. 7-12. doi: 10.1111/anae.14503.

Xu C., Peng J., Liu S., Huang Y., Guo X., Xiao H., Qi D. Goal-directed fluid therapy versus conventional fluid therapy in colorectal surgery: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Surg. 2018. 56. 264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.034.

Kravets O.V., Klygunenko O.M., Sedinkin V.A. [The method of perioperative infusion therapy in patients with urgent pathology of the abdominal cavity]. 2019. Ukrainian patent 128084, Aug 27. Ukrainian.

Hoste E.A., Maitland K.C., Brudney C.S., Mehta R., Vincent J.L., Yates D. et al. Four phases of intravenous fluid therapy: a conceptual model. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014. 113(5). 740-47. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu300.

Kyle U.G., Bosaeus I., De Lorenzo A.D., Deurenberg P., Elia M., Manuel Gómez J. et al. Bioelectrical impedance ana-lysis — part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin. Nutr. 2014. 23(6). 1430-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu. 2004.09.012.

Barzegari H., Delirooyfard A., Moatamedfar A., Sohani S., Sohani M. A new point of care ultrasound in disposition of patients with small bowel obstruction in emergency department. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research & Allied Sciences. 2016. 5(2). 200-07. doi: 10.1155/2018/3684081.

Hollerweger A., Wüstner M., Dirks K. Bowel obstruction: Sonographic evaluation. Ultraschall in der Medizin/European Journal of Ultrasound. 2015. 36(3). 216-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399292.




Copyright (c) 2019 EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2020

 

   Seo анализ сайта