Diaphragmatic dysfunction in mechanically ventilated children: a prospective observational cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.16.6.2020.216509Keywords:
diaphragmatic dysfunction, mechanical ventilation, childrenAbstract
Background. Mechanical ventilation (MV) can cause diaphragmatic injury, which is called ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and is associated with adverse treatment outcomes, prolonged weaning from respiratory therapy, and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of diaphragmatic dysfunction in children depending on the strategy of mechanical ventilation. The study hypothesis was that the occurrence of diaphragmatic dysfunction does not depend on the strategy of mechanical ventilation. Materials and methods. We conducted a prospective cohort single-center study at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care at Lviv Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital “OHMATDYT”. We included patients with acute respiratory failure who were mechanically ventilated for more than 3 days. Exclusion criteria for the study were: the refusal of the patient’s legal representatives to participate in the study at any of its stages, the patient’s agonizing state upon admission, and the onset of MV less than 48 h after prior weaning. The study included 89 individuals aged 1 month — 18 years. All patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (using random.org). Group I included people who received lung-protective ventilation strategy, group II — patients who received diaphragm-protective in addition to lung-protective ventilation strategy. Eighty-two patients were included in the data analysis. We studied indicators of diaphragmatic function (amplitude of diaphragm movement, thickening fraction, and it was considered that decrease of this indicator for less than 15 % was a marker of diaphragmatic weakness; its increase up to more than 35 % was a marker of high respiratory function and a potentially damaging factor for diaphragm; and inspiration time), parameters of acid-base balance and mechanical ventilation. To assess age-dependent data, patients were divided into age subgroups: subgroup 1— children aged 1 month — 1 year; subgroup 2 — children aged 1–3 years; subgroup 3 — children aged 3–6 years; subgroup 4 — children 6–13 years; subgroup 5 — children aged 13–18 years. Stages of the study: days 1 (d1), 3 (d3), 5 (d5), 7 (d7), 9 (d9), 14 (d14), 28 (d28). Results. Thus, we identified age-specific features of diaphragmatic dysfunction during MV: in patients of the first age subgroup in group I, there were found weakness for the right hemidiaphragm with compensatory excessive level of work for the left dome at the beginning of weaning and at stage d9, while in group II diaphragmatic overload was registered only at stage d5. In patients of the second age subgroup in group I, changes were the opposite to those described previously: we found excessive work of the right hemidiaphragm with low contractions of left dome at all stages of study in group I, while in group II the only episode of diaphragmatic weakness was in stage d3. In the third age subgroup, the proper diaphragmatic activity in group I of patients was restored later than in II group. In the fourth age subgroup in group I, there was an episode of high work of the diaphragm at stage d5, whereas in group II all data of diaphragmatic function were within the recommended parameters for diaphragm-protective strategy of MV at all stages of our study. In the fifth age subgroup in group I, an excessive work of both right and left domes of the diaphragm was significantly more often registered during weaning than in group II; however, in group II episodes of both types of changes — diaphragmatic weakness and excessive work — were detected. It was found that adding diaphragm-protective strategy of weaning from mechanical ventilation in comprehensive intensive care allowed us to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation: in patients of the first age subgroup — by 1.5 times (p = 0.08); in patients of the second subgroup — by 2.4 times (p = 0.18); in the fourth age subgroup — by 1.75 times (p = 0.1); in fifth age subgroup — by 4.25 times (p = 0.009). In patients of the third age subgroup, duration of mechanical ventilation increased by 1.1 times (p = 0.68). The frequency of complications (reintubations) was reduced in the first age subgroup by 4.3 times (p = 0.02); in the second age subgroup — by 3.4 times (p = 0.04). Conclusions. The prevalence and variety of manifestations of diaphragmatic dysfunction depend on the strategy of mechanical ventilation. Comprehensive approach during weaning from respiratory therapy, which includes diaphragm-protective strategy of ventilation, reduces the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and the duration of weaning from MV.
References
Schepens T., Verbrugghe W., Dams K., Corthouts B., Parizel P.M., Jorens P.G. The course of diaphragm atrophy in ventilated patients as-sessed with ultrasound: a longitudinal cohort study. Crit. Care. 2015. 19. 422. Published 2015 Dec 7. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1141-0.
Jaber S., Petrof B.J., Jung B., Chanques G., Berthet J.-P., Rabuel C. et al. Rapidly progressive diaphragmatic weakness and injury during mechanical ventilation in humans. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011. 183. 364-71. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201004-0670OC.
Gruther W., Benesch T., Zorn C., Paternostro-Sluga T., Quittan M., Fialka-Moser V. et al. Muscle wasting in intensive care patients: ul-trasound observation of the M. quadriceps femoris muscle layer. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2008. 40. 185-9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0139.
Demoule A., Jung B., Prodanovic H., Molinari N., Chanques G., Coirault C. et al. Diaphragm dysfunction on admission to ICU: preva-lence, risk factors and prognostic impact — a prospective study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013. 188. 213-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1668OC.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 EMERGENCY MEDICINE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our edition uses the copyright terms of Creative Commons for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree with the following terms:
- The authors retain rights for authorship of their article and grant to the edition the right of first publication of the article on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to freely distribute the published article, with the obligatory reference to the authors of original works and original publication in this journal.
- Directing the article for the publication to the editorial board (publisher), the author agrees with transmitting of rights for the protection and using the article, including parts of the article, which are protected by the copyrights, such as the author’s photo, pictures, charts, tables, etc., including the reproduction in the media and the Internet; for distributing; for the translation of the manuscript in all languages; for export and import of the publications copies of the writers’ article to spread, bringing to the general information.
- The rights mentioned above authors transfer to the edition (publisher) for the unlimited period of validity and on the territory of all countries of the world.
- The authors guarantee that they have exclusive rights for using of the article, which they have sent to the edition (publisher). The edition (the publisher) is not responsible for the violation of given guarantees by the authors to the third parties.
- The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive distribution of their article in the form in which it had been published in the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
- The policy of the journal permits and encourages the publication of the article in the Internet (in institutional repository or on a personal website) by the authors, because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and a positive effect on efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the article.
- The rights to the article are deemed transferred by the authors to the edition (the publisher) since the moment of the publication of the article in the printed or electronic version of journal.