Identification of prognostic markers in clinical decision making on massive blood transfusions in parturient women with blood loss
Keywords:obstetric hemorrhages, blood transfusion, lactate level
Background. Obstetric hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, massive bleeding in parturient women, along with infectious complications and preeclampsia, determine up to 75 % of cases of maternal mortality. The purpose of the study was to identify prognostic markers in clinical decision making for massive blood transfusions in parturient women with blood loss. Materials and methods. The study included 38 parturient women in whom childbirth was complicated by blood loss. The average age of the subjects was 27.4 ± 4.1 years, weight — 83.3 ± 4.8 kg. The number of first-time mothers was 18 patients (47.4 %), multipara — 20 mothers (52.6 %). Postpartum blood loss averaged 1,830.5 ± 622.7 ml. All bleedings were stopped according to current protocols. Results. The analysis showed that indicators such as the level of fibrinogen (p = 0.0223) and lactate (p = 0.0137) had statistical differences in the study groups with massive blood transfusions and moderate blood transfusions. One-dimensional logistic regression analysis gave an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96–0.98) for fibrinogen and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1–3.14) for lactate, and an odds ratio for shock index was 1.45 (95% CI, 0.46–4.52). The area under the ROC-curves (AUC) for fibrinogen, lactate and shock index was 0.805 (95% CI, 0.612–0.927), 0.722 (95% CI, 0.528–0.869) and 0.588 (95% CI, 0.381–0.780), respectively. The limit value of fibrinogen 2.13 g/l had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.91 and 0.55, respectively. At the same time, the limit value of lactate, equal to 4 mmol/l, had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.69 and 0.66, respectively. AUC for lactate was significantly higher than for shock index, the difference in AUC between these indicators was –0.134 (95% CI, 0.275 to –0.012) (p = 0.052). The lactate threshold of 4 mmol/l had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.69 and 0.66, respectively, while the threshold for the shock index of 1.2 had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.64 and 0.35, respectively. Conclusions. Lactate was a better prognostic marker in the clinical decision to conduct massive blood transfusions, compared with the generally accepted shock index in patients with postpartum blood loss. Lactate measurement may be useful for activating the massive blood transfusions protocol and for promoting the onset of active hemostasis procedures.
Hay S.I., Jayaraman S.P., Truelsen T. et al. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016. Vol. 388(10053). P. 1545-1602.
Heitkamp A., Lot Aronson S., van den Akker Th. et al. Major obstetric haemorrhage in Metro East, Cape Town, South Africa: a population-based cohort study using the maternal near-miss approach. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. Vol. 20(1). P. 14-22.
Sheldon W.R., Blum J., Vogel J.P. et al. Postpartum hae-morrhage management, risks, and maternal outcomes: findings from the World Health Organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. Bjog. 2014. Vol. 121(Suppl. 1). Р. 5-13.
Butwick A.J., Goodnough L.T. Transfusion and coagulation management in major obstetric hemorrhage. Curr. Opin. Anesthesiol. 2015. Vol. 28. № 3. Р. 275-284.
Rau C.S., Wu S.C., Kuo S.C. et al. Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016. Vol. 13(7). Р. 683-674.
Era S., Matsunaga S., Matsumura H. et al. Usefulness of shock indicators for determining the need for blood transfusion after massive obstetric hemorrhage. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015. Vol. 41(1). Р. 39-43.
Brooke M., Yeung L., Miraflor E. et al. Lactate predicts massive transfusion in hemodynamically normal patients. J. Surg. Res. 2016. Vol. 204. Р. 139-144.
Stokbro L.A., Schaffalitzky de Muckadell O.B., Laursen S.B. Arterial lactate does not predict outcome better than existing risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2018. Vol. 53(5). Р. 586-591.
Наказ Міністерства охорони здоров’я України від 24 березня 2014 р. № 205 «Акушерські кровотечі».
Mavrides E., Allard S., Chandraharan E. et al. Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage: Green-top Guideline No. 52. BJOG. 2017. Vol. 124. № 5. e106-e149.
Moodley J., Pattinson R.C., Fawcus S. et al. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in South Africa: a case study. BJOG. 2014. Vol. 121(Suppl. 4). Р. 53-60.
Sohn C.H., Kim Y.J., Seo D.W. et al. Blood lactate concentration and shock index associated with massive transfusion in emergency department patients with primary postpartum haemorrhage. Br. J. Anaesth. 2018. Vol. 121. № 2. Р. 378-383.
Soller B., Zou F., Dale Prince M. et al. Comparison of Noninvasive pH and Blood Lactate as Predictors of Mortality in a Swine Hemorrhagic Shock with Restricted Volume Resuscitation Model. Shock. 2015. Vol. 44(Suppl. 1). Р. 90-95.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our edition uses the copyright terms of Creative Commons for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree with the following terms:
- The authors retain rights for authorship of their article and grant to the edition the right of first publication of the article on a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to freely distribute the published article, with the obligatory reference to the authors of original works and original publication in this journal.
- Directing the article for the publication to the editorial board (publisher), the author agrees with transmitting of rights for the protection and using the article, including parts of the article, which are protected by the copyrights, such as the author’s photo, pictures, charts, tables, etc., including the reproduction in the media and the Internet; for distributing; for the translation of the manuscript in all languages; for export and import of the publications copies of the writers’ article to spread, bringing to the general information.
- The rights mentioned above authors transfer to the edition (publisher) for the unlimited period of validity and on the territory of all countries of the world.
- The authors guarantee that they have exclusive rights for using of the article, which they have sent to the edition (publisher). The edition (the publisher) is not responsible for the violation of given guarantees by the authors to the third parties.
- The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive distribution of their article in the form in which it had been published in the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
- The policy of the journal permits and encourages the publication of the article in the Internet (in institutional repository or on a personal website) by the authors, because it contributes to productive scientific discussion and a positive effect on efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the article.
- The rights to the article are deemed transferred by the authors to the edition (the publisher) since the moment of the publication of the article in the printed or electronic version of journal.