Hemodynamic Monitoring in Practice of Intensive Care Unit
Abstract
The article presents an overview of modern methods of hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Pinsky M.R., Payen D. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring (Update in Intensive Care Medicine) // Springer. — 2005.
Паромов К.В. и др. Анестезиолог и гемодинамика: что нам дают протоколы целенаправленной терапии // Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. — 2012. — № 3. — С. 17-21.
Vincent J.L. et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring — a consensus of 16 // Crit. Care. — 2011. — № 15(4). — 229.
Йовенко И.А., Кобеляцкий Ю.Ю., Царев А.В. и др. Практика инфузионно-трансфузионной терапии кровотечений при тяжелой огнестрельной травме: вопросы выбора препаратов и целевых конечных точек // Медицина неотложных состояний. — 2015. — № 2(65). — С. 164-170.
Vincent J.L., Pelosi P., Pearse R. et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12 // Crit. Care. — 2015. — № 8(19). — 224.
Cecconi М. et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine // Intensive Care Med. — 2014. — № 40(12). — Р. 1795-1815.
Suehiro К. et al. Guiding Goal-Directed Therapy // Curr. Anesthesiol. Rep. — 2014. — № 4. — Р. 360-375.
Peeters Y. et al. Hemodynamic monitoring: To calibrate or not to calibrate? Part 1 — Calibrated techniques // Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. — 2015. — № 47(5). — Р. 487-500.
Bernards J. et al. Hemodynamic monitoring: To calibrate or not to calibrate? Part 2 — Non-calibrated techniques // Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. — 2015. — № 47(5). — Р. 501-16.
Sugo Y. et al. A Novel Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor Based on Pulse Wave Transit Time // Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. — 2010. — Р. 2853-63.
Yamada T. et al. Verification of a non-invasive continuous cardiac output measurement method based on the pulse-contour analysis combined with pulse wave transit time // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. — 2010. — № 27(Suppl. 47). — 3AP5-9.
Yamada T. et al. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output // Anesth. Analg. — 2012. — № 115(1). — Р. 82-7.
Tsutsui M. et al. Pulse wave transit time measurements of cardiac output in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy: a comparison of the esCCO system with thermodilution // Anesth. Analg. — 2013. — № 117(6). — Р. 1307-12.
Mansencal N. et al. Usefulness of a noninvasive cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time in coronary care unit // Int. J. Cardiol. — 2013. — № 168(4). — Р. 4411-2.
Bataille B. et al. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care // Br. J. Anaesth. — 2012. — № 109(6). — Р. 879-86.
Feissel M. et al. Pulse Wave Transit Time Measurements of Cardiac Output in Septic Shock Patients: A Comparison of the Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output System with Transthoracic Echocardiography // PLoS One. — 2015. — № 10(6). — e0130489.
Cherpanath T.G. et al. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness by Passive Leg Raising: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Clinical Trials // Critical Care Medicine. — 2016. — Vol. 44(Is. 5). — Р. 981-991.
Boyd J.H. et al. Assessment of adequacy of volume resuscitation // Current Opinion in Critical Care: Post Author Corrections. — July 29, 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.5.76.2016.76433
Copyright (c) 2016 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2018
