Acute Coronary Syndrome: Thrombolytic Therapy or Coronary Intervention?

S.M. Stadnik

Abstract


The article deals with the issues of modern treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Attention is drawn to the importance of carrying out early pharmacologic and mechanical revascularization. We consider three clinical cases in which we used different methods of revascularization.


Keywords


acute coronary syndrome; thrombolysis; percutaneous coronary intervention

References


Spencer B. King, III, Sidney C. Smith, Jr, John W. Hirshfeld, Jr. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines // Circulation. — 2008. — 117. — P. 261-295.

Рекомендации ESC по ведению больных с инфарктом мио­карда с подъемом сегмента ST // Medicine Review. — 2008. — № 5(5). — С. 8-18.

Рекомендации Европейского Кардиологического Общества по проведению перкутанных коронарных вмешательств. — К., 2005. — С. 12-13, 16, 27.

Allender S., Scarborough P., Peto V. European cardiovascular disease statistics. 2008 edition. British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford; Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.7.54.2013.88675

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

© Publishing House Zaslavsky, 1997-2017

 

 Яндекс.МетрикаSeo анализ сайта Рейтинг@Mail.ru