Anesthetic management of median nerve decompression in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Authors

  • A.K. Rushay Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Skiba Skiba Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Yu.S. Lysaychuk Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • I.V. Voyennyy Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.18.2.2022.1473

Keywords:

carpal tunnel syndrome, multimodal perioperative pain relief

Abstract

Background. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy. In patients with ineffective conservative treatment for severe forms, carpal tunnel release (CTR) is shown, which allows an improvement in more than 90 % of cases. In addition to adequate low-traumatic intervention tactics, optimal perioperative analgesia is also of great importance in restoring the function of the median nerve (correction of neuropathic disorders). The work was aimed to improve the results of treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome by the adequate perioperative anesthetic provision of median nerve decompression. The objectives of the work were to propose a multimodal perioperative provision of median nerve decompression; to study the dynamics of pain syndrome; to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Materials and methods. We examined 52 patients with CTS. The intervention was carried out under multimodal anesthesia — local anesthesia. At the beginning of the operation, a lidocaine solution was injected into the cavity of the carpal canal. Dexketoprofen was administered intramuscularly 20–30 minutes before the intervention; intravenous paracetamol. Intramuscular administration of dexketoprofen was repeated after 12 hours. The Boston BCTQ questionnaire was used to assess the recovery of hand function and the dynamics of neuropathic disorders in the groups with minimally invasive and open standard intervention. The dynamics of the pain syndrome intensity were measured by the values of the visual analogue scale (VAS) according to a 10-point assessment. Results. The dynamics of VAS indices indicated insignificant pain even in the group with an open, relatively traumatic, intervention. There was no significant difference between the indicators of the groups; pain syndrome during the intervention and the first 12 hours after it was assessed by the operated patients as mild pain. Additional anesthesia, especially opioid anesthetics, was not required. Within four weeks, the scores on the Boston BCTQ questionnaire had statistically insignificant differences, and in 3 and 6 months, they practically did not differ in the groups. At all stages of observation, no significant statistical differences were found between the groups. Conclusions. Conducted multimodal perioperative anesthesia in the proposed scope allowed achieving a good analgesic effect, approximating the results of neuropathic and functional rehabilitation in patients of different groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Лемешов О., Чирка И. Диагностика и лечение туннельных невропатий. PMJUA. 2020. 5 (1). 44-51. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31636/pmjua.v5i1.5

Feng B., Chen K., Zhu X., Ip W.Y., Andersen L.L., Page P., Wang Y. Prevalence and risk factors of self-reported wrist and hand symptoms and clinically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome among office workers in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021. Jan 6. Vol. 21. № 1. Р. 57-63. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10137-1.

Белова Н.А. Вегетативные нарушения при идиопатическом карпальном туннельном синдроме. Дис... к.м.н. М., 2018. 112 с.

Юсупова Д.Г., Зимин А.А., Гришина Д.А. Карпальный туннельный синдром: оценка необходимости реабилитационно-восстановительного лечения после эндоскопической декомпрессии срединного нерва в позднем и отдаленном послеоперационном периодах. Нервно-мышечные болезни. 2019. № 9(4). С. 34-43. DOI: 10.17650/2222-8721-2019-9-4-34-43.

Gilveg A., Parfenov V., Evzikov G. Median nerve decompression in carpal tunnel syndrome: Short- and long-term results. Neuro­logy, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018. Vol. 10. Р. 79-85. DOI: 10.14412/2074-2711-2018-3-79-85.

Turgut M.C., Saglam G., Toy S. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pillar pain after open carpal tunnel release: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. Korean J. Pain. 2021. 34. 315-321. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.315

Multanen J., Uimonen M.M., Repo J.P. et al. Use of conservative therapy before and after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. 22. 484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04378-3

Samant P.D., Sane R.M. Evaluation of Functional and Symptomatic Outcomes After Vitamin D3 Administration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome With Hypovitaminosis D. Hand (NY). 2021 Jan 20. doi: 10.1177/1558944720988130.

Talay Çalış H., Aslaner H., Doğan Sunkak S., Sedefoğlu N., Tomruk Sütbeyaz S., Güler E. Comparison of Therapeutic Effectiveness between Kinesio Taping Technique and Static Resting Splint in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Eur. J. Ther. 2021. 27(1). 14-9. DOI: 10.5152/eurjther.2021.20032.

Phan A., Hammert W. Evaluation of PROMIS Outcomes for Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome With and Without Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Hand (NY). 2021 Jul 3. doi: 10.1177/15589447211028921.

Braga D.M.O.S., Rocha A. de S., Amaral I.J. de L., Diniz D.S., Guimarães V. de C. Epidemiology and approach in Carpal Tunnel Syndrom: An analysis of the impact on return on labor. Interação. 2021. 21(3). 24-42. https://interacao.org/index.php/edicoes/article/view/81

Published

2022-05-19

How to Cite

Rushay, A., Skiba, V., Lysaychuk, Y., & Voyennyy, I. (2022). Anesthetic management of median nerve decompression in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 18(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.18.2.2022.1473

Issue

Section

Original Researches